• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 49)

No cure for negligent misrepresentation

Posted on: November 22, 2015 Last updated on: November 22, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Filing an amended return will not cure a negligent misrepresentation made in the original return, and so the CRA will still be able to reassess beyond the normal reassessment period in respect of the misrepresentation. Georgina Tollstam, “Deceased’s Return Reassessed…
Continue reading “No cure for negligent misrepresentation”…

Letters of intent and control

Posted on: November 22, 2015 Last updated on: November 22, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
From Karen Stilwell, “CRA View – LOI May Engage 251(5)(b)”, Tax Hyperion 12:9 (September 2015): CRA’s position on the issue is that the question may only be answered on a case-by-case basis…
Continue reading “Letters of intent and control”…

ONCA: More Delay

Posted on: November 22, 2015 Last updated on: November 22, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
It appears that the Ontario Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 (the “ONCA”) won’t come into force until 2017, seven years after it was enacted. What’s with the delay?
Continue reading “ONCA: More Delay”…

Terminal return exemption claim does not create hard basis

Posted on: November 11, 2015 Last updated on: November 11, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
From question 7 of the 2015 APFF roundtable: if Mr X’s estate claims the capital gain exemption in his terminal return in respect of a gain realized on his deemed disposition of Opco shares, then the resulting addition to the…
Continue reading “Terminal return exemption claim does not create hard basis”…

Amalgamations and CDA

Posted on: November 11, 2015 Last updated on: November 11, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
From question 6 of the 2015 APFF Roundtable, it appears that the positive capital dividend account balance created by Subco’s realization of a capital gain could be paid to Parentco and then to Parentco’s shareholders as a capital dividend even…
Continue reading “Amalgamations and CDA”…

Castro

Posted on: November 6, 2015 Last updated on: November 6, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Craig Burley has written an interesting post on R v Castro, 2015 FCA 225. My summary of Craig’s summary: ouch!
Continue reading “Castro”…

Share attributes

Posted on: November 3, 2015 Last updated on: November 3, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Neil Armstrong’s summary of a butterfly ruling (2014-0533601R3), he wrote: The reorganization started off in the usual manner with a s. 86 reorg under which the DC shareholders exchanged their old common and preferred shares for special “butterfly” shares…
Continue reading “Share attributes”…

Bike stands

Posted on: November 3, 2015 Last updated on: November 3, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Neil Armstrong notes the following CRA positions on employee benefits from the 2015 APFF Conference: Providing a bike stand area for employees does not confer a benefit if the employees’ usage of it is “difficult to quantify and measure”. Providing…
Continue reading “Bike stands”…

55(2) as a tax reduction tool

Posted on: October 26, 2015 Last updated on: October 26, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA accepts that the GAAR will not apply where a taxpayer deliberately triggers 55(2) to reduce tax. Rather than having Opco pay a dividend to Mr A, Mr A could roll his shares of Opco to Holdco and have…
Continue reading “55(2) as a tax reduction tool”…

NPO T1044 filing requirements

Posted on: October 16, 2015 Last updated on: October 16, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Under s 149(12) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), certain not-for-profits (“NPOs”, ie entities exempt from tax under s 149(1)(l)) must file a T1044 information return. An NPO must file the T1044 if (a) the total of all amounts each…
Continue reading “NPO T1044 filing requirements”…
« Previous page 1 … 47 48 49 50 51 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation