• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 47)

45(3) elections and the principal residence exemption

Posted on: February 13, 2016 Last updated on: February 13, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
If you buy a home and then change its use, should you always file the 45(3) election to defer any gain? Maybe not, according to James Painter, “Principal-Residence Tax-Deferral Election May Be Inadvisable” (Feb 2016) 6:1 Canadian Tax Focus. Mr…
Continue reading “45(3) elections and the principal residence exemption”…

Employee theft

Posted on: February 13, 2016 Last updated on: February 13, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Mark Tonkovich, “Theft by Owners or Senior Employees: Deductibility of Losses” (Feb 2016) 6:1 Canadian Tax Focus, analyzes employee theft as discussed in Income Tax Folio S3-F9-C1, “Lottery Winnings, Miscellaneous Receipts, and Income (and Losses) from Crime”. The Folio sets…
Continue reading “Employee theft”…

Section 160 and shareholder benefits

Posted on: February 13, 2016 Last updated on: February 13, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Can the Minister assess a taxpayer under section 160 in respect of an amount already included in the taxpayer’s income under subsection 15(1)? From Justice Bocock, in Parihar v R, 2015 TCC 52 at ¶45: shareholder who has been…
Continue reading “Section 160 and shareholder benefits”…

Unpaid income tax and bankruptcy

Posted on: February 11, 2016 Last updated on: February 11, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Schnier v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ONCA 5, the Court held that an amount of tax owing (about $4.4 million) was a contingent claim because the relevant assessments were under appeal to the Tax Court. As a result, the…
Continue reading “Unpaid income tax and bankruptcy”…

A simpler T1135

Posted on: February 8, 2016 Last updated on: February 8, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
My thanks to Fred Buzzelli, who sent me a link to a good article by Gabe Hayos on the simplified T1135.
Continue reading “A simpler T1135”…

Are step children related?

Posted on: February 2, 2016 Last updated on: February 2, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Mr X and Ms Y are common law partners. Each of them has a son from a previous relationship. Are the sons related for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada)? The CRA says “yes” because the step brothers…
Continue reading “Are step children related?”…

Misrepresentation

Posted on: January 27, 2016 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
From Justice Bocock, in Robertson v R, 2015 TCC 246, we read the following regarding whether a mistake of law amounts to a negligent misrepresentation: wise and prudent person is, generally by definition, not unknowledgeable of the law. However,…
Continue reading “Misrepresentation”…

No refund for you

Posted on: January 27, 2016 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
A corporate payor doesn’t get a refund if it pays a dividend but fails to file its tax return for the year within three years. But at least RDTOH isn’t reduced either. See Dino Infanti, “FCA Agrees: Dividend Refund Timed…
Continue reading “No refund for you”…

55(2) This Week

Posted on: January 27, 2016 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Manu Kakkar and Marissa Halil, in “Subsection 55(2): The CRA’s Recent Positions” Tax for the Owner-Manager 16:1 (January 2016), provide a useful summary of the CRA’s pronouncements on 55(2) at the Tax Foundation conference. The CRA is concerned that deliberately…
Continue reading “55(2) This Week”…

Neutral citation for PITA

Posted on: January 22, 2016 Last updated on: January 22, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Carswell is making the Practitioner’s Income Tax Act (PITA) even more useful by switching to neutral citations for its case references. The neutral citation provides a sure-fire way to locate a case quickly and easily, regardless of the database you…
Continue reading “Neutral citation for PITA”…
« Previous page 1 … 45 46 47 48 49 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation