• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 50)

Collections scam

Posted on: October 10, 2015 Last updated on: October 10, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
I have heard recently about a number of taxpayers who received voicemail messages purporting to be from the CRA. The caller left a message threatening the seizure of assets or the immediate imposition of criminal or severe civil sanctions if…
Continue reading “Collections scam”…

Section 51 loss on conversion

Posted on: October 7, 2015 Last updated on: October 7, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis

Summary of Technical interpretation 2014-0524651I7 E (May 6, 2014).

Continue reading “Section 51 loss on conversion”…

Spousal trust cannot be a GRE

Posted on: September 17, 2015 Last updated on: September 17, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA, in technical interpretation 2014-0553181E5F (June 25, 2015), says that a spousal trust cannot be a “graduated rate estate” for the purposes of the Act.
Continue reading “Spousal trust cannot be a GRE”…

Interest on debt to acquire land; bad debts

Posted on: September 16, 2015 Last updated on: September 16, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Per Lyons J in Kokai-Kuun Estate v R, 2015 TCC 217: a taxpayer cannot add to the cost of vacant land interest and property taxes paid in respect of the land where it was acquired for “investment” purposes but never…
Continue reading “Interest on debt to acquire land; bad debts”…

Personal services business

Posted on: September 15, 2015 Last updated on: September 15, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
C.J. McCarty Inc. v R, 2015 TCC 201, is a good recent analysis of whether the personal services business rules applied to a taxpayer in light of Wiebe Door and Sagaz. Bruce Russell, “McCarty – A Personal Services Business?” Tax…
Continue reading “Personal services business”…

Shareholder agreements and de jure control

Posted on: September 15, 2015 Last updated on: September 15, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Will a shareholder agreement that permits a minority shareholder to elect the majority of the corporation’s board confer control on the minority shareholder? The Tax Court in Kruger Wayagamack Inc. v R, 2015 TCC 90, said not if the minority…
Continue reading “Shareholder agreements and de jure control”…

Stock options and death

Posted on: September 15, 2015 Last updated on: September 15, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
From Andrew Morreale, “Stock Option Deduction Is Available on Death” Canadian Tax Focus 5:3 (August 2015): An employment benefit in respect of unexercised employee stock options that arises on death is eligible for the paragraph 110(1)(d) deduction through the use…
Continue reading “Stock options and death”…

Alberta trust vindicated

Posted on: September 15, 2015 Last updated on: September 15, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
What does it take to make an Alberta trust “work” in light of Fundy Settlement v Canada, 2012 SCC 14? From Colin Poon, “Interprovincial Tax Planning Using Trusts Upheld”, Canadian Tax Focus 5:3 (August 2015) re Discovery Trust v Canada…
Continue reading “Alberta trust vindicated”…

Crooked preparer jail

Posted on: September 13, 2015 Last updated on: September 13, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
I’ve complained before about crooked preparers who file false expense or donation claims for (sometimes) clueless taxpayers. The taxpayers get the refund, pay the preparer’s fee (which is often pretty generous) and then are reassessed for the bogus claims (with…
Continue reading “Crooked preparer jail”…

CRA charity nonsense—it’s insidious

Posted on: September 8, 2015 Last updated on: September 8, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Craig Burley is Unhappy about a recent CRA advisory on registered charities and partisan political activities, which advisory includes the following gem: When a charity invites comments on its website, blogs, or on social media, it should monitor them for…
Continue reading “CRA charity nonsense—it’s insidious”…
« Previous page 1 … 48 49 50 51 52 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation