• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

Category: Corporations (page 2)

Dividend caps

Posted on: June 24, 2016 Last updated on: June 24, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis

I like dividend caps on fixed-value shares. I’ve complained before about the odour emanating from shares that are entitled to unlimited dividends but that are redeemable and retractable for a fixed amount. The CRA seems to smell something too, in technical interpretation 2016-0626781E5.

Continue reading “Dividend caps”…

File Under “Annoying”

Posted on: April 11, 2016 Last updated on: April 11, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
You can file the following under “Annoying”: a non-resident that voluntarily registers for GST will also be assigned a corporate income tax account automatically. The non-resident must then go to the trouble of having the account cancelled after proving to…
Continue reading “File Under “Annoying””…

No refund for you

Posted on: January 27, 2016 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
A corporate payor doesn’t get a refund if it pays a dividend but fails to file its tax return for the year within three years. But at least RDTOH isn’t reduced either. See Dino Infanti, “FCA Agrees: Dividend Refund Timed…
Continue reading “No refund for you”…

Share attributes

Posted on: November 3, 2015 Last updated on: November 3, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Neil Armstrong’s summary of a butterfly ruling (2014-0533601R3), he wrote: The reorganization started off in the usual manner with a s. 86 reorg under which the DC shareholders exchanged their old common and preferred shares for special “butterfly” shares…
Continue reading “Share attributes”…

Shareholder agreements and de jure control

Posted on: September 15, 2015 Last updated on: September 15, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Will a shareholder agreement that permits a minority shareholder to elect the majority of the corporation’s board confer control on the minority shareholder? The Tax Court in Kruger Wayagamack Inc. v R, 2015 TCC 90, said not if the minority…
Continue reading “Shareholder agreements and de jure control”…

Accounting proposal postponed

Posted on: July 15, 2015 Last updated on: July 15, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
KPMG reports that the implementation of a proposal to require corporations to treat typical freeze shares as debt (with an offsetting special debit to equity) for financial statement purposes has been postponed to January 1, 2018 (from January 1, 2016).
Continue reading “Accounting proposal postponed”…

No late-filed eligible dividend designations

Posted on: July 12, 2015 Last updated on: July 12, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Opco pays a dividend in year One, but it doesn’t believe it has any GRIP at that time, and so no eligible dividend designation is made in respect of the dividend. The CRA later reassesses Opco, and one of the…
Continue reading “No late-filed eligible dividend designations”…

55(2) Changes

Posted on: May 30, 2015 Last updated on: July 12, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
Finance is proposing to amend 55(2) and related provisions for dividends paid after April 20, 2015. 55(2) will contain two new purpose tests. A dividend (other than an 84(3) dividend) might be caught under the new rules if one of…
Continue reading “55(2) Changes”…

74.4(4) Exception Inapplicable

Posted on: April 20, 2015 Last updated on: April 20, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
74.4(4) will not apply to save an estate freeze of Opco from the corporate attribution rule where a trust holds shares in Holdco rather than shares in Opco directly. 74.4(4) would also not apply where Opco1 and Opco2 are frozen,…
Continue reading “74.4(4) Exception Inapplicable”…

Refund not refunded

Posted on: April 3, 2015 Last updated on: January 27, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
What happens when a corporation fails to claim refundable tax in a timely manner? Does the amount not refunded reduce RDTOH anyway (per the CRA)? Not according to the Court in Presidential MSH Corporation v R, 2015 TCC 61. (See…
Continue reading “Refund not refunded”…
« Previous page 1 2 3 4 … 13 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

Recent Posts

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation