• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 44)

The S 160 Family Law Exception

Posted on: September 17, 2016 Last updated on: September 17, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Subsection 160(4) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) in effect provides an exception to the “long arm” of section 160 where at any time a taxpayer has transferred property to the taxpayer’s spouse or common-law partner pursuant to a decree,…
Continue reading “The S 160 Family Law Exception”…

Partnership negative ACB

Posted on: September 1, 2016 Last updated on: December 3, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
In general, the negative ACB of an interest of a general partner does not trigger a capital gain at the end of a fiscal year. The negative ACB does not give rise to a capital gain until the partner disposes…
Continue reading “Partnership negative ACB”…

Form matters, again

Posted on: September 1, 2016 Last updated on: September 1, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
In David Anthony v Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 955, the taxpayer applied for judicial review of a decision of the Minister. The taxpayer had requested that the Minister adjust his return for 2001 to permit the deduction of lease…
Continue reading “Form matters, again”…

Narrow De Facto Control

Posted on: August 16, 2016 Last updated on: August 16, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Ashvin Singh, “FCA Reinstates Narrow View of De Facto Control” 6:3 Canadian Tax Focus (August 2016): The potential expansion of de facto control in McGillivray Restaurant Ltd. (2014 TCC 357) … has been curtailed by McGillivray Restaurant Ltd. v. The…
Continue reading “Narrow De Facto Control”…

Fiscal Arbitrators update

Posted on: August 16, 2016 Last updated on: August 16, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Carolyn Hogan, “Escaping Penalties After Admitting False Statements” 6:3 Canadian Tax Focus (August 2016) is a good snapshot of the state of play in the ongoing Fiscal Arbitrators fiasco.
Continue reading “Fiscal Arbitrators update”…

Important safety tip

Posted on: July 22, 2016 Last updated on: July 22, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Neal Armstrong alerts us to a nasty trap. Suppose Opco pays a dividend to a trust-shareholder, which immediately distributes an amount to Holdco, a beneficiary of the trust. Suppose that the trust then sells its shares of Opco, before the…
Continue reading “Important safety tip”…

Dividend caps

Posted on: June 24, 2016 Last updated on: June 24, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis

I like dividend caps on fixed-value shares. I’ve complained before about the odour emanating from shares that are entitled to unlimited dividends but that are redeemable and retractable for a fixed amount. The CRA seems to smell something too, in technical interpretation 2016-0626781E5.

Continue reading “Dividend caps”…

Estates vs Trusts Coda

Posted on: June 24, 2016 Last updated on: June 24, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
As a coda to my article on “trusts vs estates”, I offer the following from Chow and Pryor, Taxation of Trusts and Estates (Toronto: Carswell, 2016) at 9.2.2(c)(ii): The residue is not ascertained until the debts and other liabilities of…
Continue reading “Estates vs Trusts Coda”…

US grantor trust

Posted on: June 14, 2016 Last updated on: June 14, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Neal Armstrong notes that the CRA continues to maintain that a US grantor trust is not a bare trust for Canadian tax purposes. See his summary of the CRA response to question 10 at the 2016 STEP conference.
Continue reading “US grantor trust”…

Onus and penalties

Posted on: May 20, 2016 Last updated on: May 20, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis

In Guindon v R, 2012 TCC 287, Mr Justice Bedard wrote the following about the onus of proof when the Minister seeks to impose gross negligence penalties:

Continue reading “Onus and penalties”…
« Previous page 1 … 42 43 44 45 46 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation