• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 42)

TPSs and PACs

Posted on: January 5, 2017 Last updated on: January 5, 2017 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA has previously stated that a deemed dividend arising on the redemption of a taxable preferred share (TPS) for a “specified amount” will not be an excluded dividend for the purposes of Part VI.1 of the Income Tax Act…
Continue reading “TPSs and PACs”…

Borrowing from RRSP to loan to Opco

Posted on: January 5, 2017 Last updated on: January 5, 2017 Written by: John Loukidelis
If the technical requirements of the Income Tax Act (Canada) are met, a taxpayer can mortgage her house to her RRSP and then deduct the interest on the loan from the RRSP, if the loan proceeds are on-loaned to Opco.…
Continue reading “Borrowing from RRSP to loan to Opco”…

Self-assessing GAAR?

Posted on: January 5, 2017 Last updated on: January 5, 2017 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Quinco Financial Inc v R, 2016 TCC 190, Justice Bocock held that interest on a GAAR assessment accrues from the balance due date, just like any other assessment. His Honour, however, in obiter, also stated that a taxpayer has…
Continue reading “Self-assessing GAAR?”…

Corporate gifts

Posted on: December 23, 2016 Last updated on: December 23, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Neal Armstrong reports that the Quebec Court of Appeal, in Emballages Starflex Inc. v Agence du revenu du Québec, 2016 QCCA 1856, has held that a corporation cannot deduct a gift to a charity as a business or promotional expense.…
Continue reading “Corporate gifts”…

No rollover for voluntary dispositions of farm quota

Posted on: December 19, 2016 Last updated on: December 19, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
In technical interpretation 2016-0666901E5, the CRA was asked whether the new rules applicable to farm quota after 2016 will provide for a rollover equivalent to the one found in s 14(6) of the ITA for voluntary dispositions of quota. The…
Continue reading “No rollover for voluntary dispositions of farm quota”…

Agreement not to audit

Posted on: December 16, 2016 Last updated on: December 16, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Neal Armstrong reports that the Federal Court has ruled that an agreement concluded by one auditor not to further audit a taxpayer is binding on the CRA. See Rosenberg v MNR, 2016 FC 1376. I have not been able to…
Continue reading “Agreement not to audit”…

S 55(2.1)(b)(ii)(B) and cash

Posted on: December 3, 2016 Last updated on: December 3, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
According to the CRA, cash is property for the purposes of the application of s 55(2.1)(b)(ii)(B). 2016 CTF Roundtable Q8. S 55(2.1)(b) reads as follows: (b) it is the case that (i) one of the purposes of the payment or…
Continue reading “S 55(2.1)(b)(ii)(B) and cash”…

RRSP/RRIF/TFSA “advantages”

Posted on: December 3, 2016 Last updated on: December 3, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA believes that an annuitant who pays fees (investment management and other fees) for an RRSP/RRIF/TFSA thereby derives an “advantage”. The CRA says that, with effect after 2017, plans must be changed so that the fees are charged to…
Continue reading “RRSP/RRIF/TFSA “advantages””…

More s 55 hocus pocus

Posted on: December 3, 2016 Last updated on: December 3, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
Holdco owns all of Opco’s issued shares. Both corporations have calendar year-ends. Opco doesn’t have any safe income, but it has $383,333 of RDTOH. Opco pays a $1 million dividend to Holdco, which pays a $1 million dividend to its…
Continue reading “More s 55 hocus pocus”…

You’d better calculate safe income

Posted on: December 2, 2016 Last updated on: December 2, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA appeared unsympathetic to the idea that detailed calculations of safe income might not be necessary where Opco is wholly-owned by Holdco, and Opco accounting income does not differ greatly from its taxable income. The CRA representative spoke darkly…
Continue reading “You’d better calculate safe income”…
« Previous page 1 … 40 41 42 43 44 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation