• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

Category: Principal residence exemption

PRE and COVID

Posted on: June 7, 2024 Last updated on: June 5, 2024 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA has stated that a residence outside of Canada that was not be used in 2020 and 2021 because of COVID travel restrictions and advisories likely would not be “ordinarily inhabited” in those years for the purposes of the…
Continue reading “PRE and COVID”…

Flipping out

Posted on: April 19, 2023 Last updated on: April 19, 2023 Written by: John Loukidelis
The new “flipped property” rules in subsection 12(12) to (14) appear to apply in perverse ways. Suppose a taxpayer transfers a home to a corporation on a rollover basis and the corporation then sells the home within the “bright line…
Continue reading “Flipping out”…

Happy Valley applied

Posted on: October 27, 2021 Last updated on: October 27, 2021 Written by: John Loukidelis
Happy Valley Farms Ltd. v MNR, 2 CTC 259, provides a handy list of the factors a court will generally consider in deciding whether a gain realized on the sale of a home was on income account. The Court…
Continue reading “Happy Valley applied”…

PRE and Trusts

Posted on: August 12, 2017 Last updated on: August 12, 2017 Written by: John Loukidelis
Jack Bernstein and Robert Santia, “Principal Residence Exemption: Trusts and Non-Residents”, Canadian Tax Highlights 25:2 (February 2017) comments on the rules now applicable to the principal residence exemption (the PRE) where a trust owns the residence. After 2016, only certain…
Continue reading “PRE and Trusts”…

Get that divorce!

Posted on: September 20, 2016 Last updated on: September 25, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Balanko Estate v R, 2015 TCC 66, an informal procedure case, the taxpayer could not claim the principal residence exemption for a property because she had never divorced her husband, from whom she had been living separate and apart…
Continue reading “Get that divorce!”…

45(3) elections and the principal residence exemption

Posted on: February 13, 2016 Last updated on: February 13, 2016 Written by: John Loukidelis
If you buy a home and then change its use, should you always file the 45(3) election to defer any gain? Maybe not, according to James Painter, “Principal-Residence Tax-Deferral Election May Be Inadvisable” (Feb 2016) 6:1 Canadian Tax Focus. Mr…
Continue reading “45(3) elections and the principal residence exemption”…

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

Recent Posts

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation