• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

Category: Normal reassessment period

Negligence for not reviewing return

Posted on: June 5, 2025 Last updated on: June 5, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

Swiss bank account trouble

Posted on: March 7, 2025 Last updated on: March 7, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Azmayesh-Fard v R, 2025 TCC 20, the Court considered whether the CRA had properly reassessed a taxpayer beyond the normal reassessment period and imposed gross negligence penalties for unreported income from a Swiss bank account and for failing to…
Continue reading “Swiss bank account trouble”…

Source of income and the normal reassessment period

Posted on: February 18, 2025 Last updated on: February 14, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Boles v R, 2024 TCC 167, the taxpayers incurred losses in respect of “Dog Activities” (breeding and selling purebred dogs and attending dog shows) and some rental properties. The Court concluded the CRA could not reassess statute-barred years for…
Continue reading “Source of income and the normal reassessment period”…

Reassessment outside the normal reassessment period

Posted on: July 24, 2024 Last updated on: July 18, 2024 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Cheema v R, 2024 TCC 81, the Court held that the CRA was entitled to reassess beyond the normal reassessment period where the taxpayer provided no good explanation for a disposition of real property he did not report or…
Continue reading “Reassessment outside the normal reassessment period”…

Negligent misrepresentation

Posted on: April 27, 2023 Last updated on: April 27, 2023 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Goldhar v R, 2023 TCC 30, the CRA alleged that certain transfers had conferred a benefit on the appellant in a total amount of about $5.5 million. The appellant argued that the transfers were inter-corporate loans that had not…
Continue reading “Negligent misrepresentation”…

Valuations and the normal reassessment period

Posted on: April 13, 2022 Last updated on: April 13, 2022 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Lauria v R, 2021 TCC 66, the taxpayers used a model from a shareholder agreement to value shares they sold to family trusts although an IPO of the issuer of the shares was imminent. The Court found that the…
Continue reading “Valuations and the normal reassessment period”…

Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period

Posted on: February 15, 2022 Last updated on: February 15, 2022 Written by: John Loukidelis
This article discusses Hansen v R, 2020 TCC 102. In our view, the Hansen decision is consistent with the four-part test established in Aridi v R, 2013 TCC 74. Mr. Hansen was aware that there was a PRE and that…
Continue reading “Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period”…

Taxpayer onus regarding limitation period

Posted on: March 1, 2021 Last updated on: March 1, 2021 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Manna v R, 2019 TCC 70 (informal procedure) the Court held that the taxpayer has the onus to show when a normal reassessment period began if the taxpayer wishes to rely on the expiry of the period as a…
Continue reading “Taxpayer onus regarding limitation period”…

A valuable envelope

Posted on: June 14, 2018 Last updated on: June 18, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
S 244(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) provides that an assessment is deemed to have been made on the date that it is sent, and the date on which an assessment is sent by first class mail “or its…
Continue reading “A valuable envelope”…

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Related siblings under section 55

At the 2025 APFF conference, the CRA stated that the sisters in the following scenario would be related as per subparagraph 55(5)(e)(i): Sister A and Sister B each owned 100 percent of the shares of their respective holding corporations, whose…
Continue reading “Related siblings under section 55”…

Subsection 55(2) can be good actually

If subsection 55(2) applies to a dividend, and the cash related to the dividend needs to be paid to an individual shareholder anyway, the shareholder will likely be better off compared to the situation obtained when the subsection does not…
Continue reading “Subsection 55(2) can be good actually”…

Loans by a partnership to a partner

The CRA has generally held that a loan from a partnership to a partner will reduce the ACB of the partner’s partnership interest because of the “all-encompassing” language in subparagraph 53(2)(c)(v) of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The CRA has…
Continue reading “Loans by a partnership to a partner”…

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Recent Posts

Related siblings under section 55

At the 2025 APFF conference, the CRA stated that the sisters in the following scenario would be related as per subparagraph 55(5)(e)(i): Sister A and Sister B each owned 100 percent of the shares of their respective holding corporations, whose…
Continue reading “Related siblings under section 55”…

Subsection 55(2) can be good actually

If subsection 55(2) applies to a dividend, and the cash related to the dividend needs to be paid to an individual shareholder anyway, the shareholder will likely be better off compared to the situation obtained when the subsection does not…
Continue reading “Subsection 55(2) can be good actually”…

Loans by a partnership to a partner

The CRA has generally held that a loan from a partnership to a partner will reduce the ACB of the partner’s partnership interest because of the “all-encompassing” language in subparagraph 53(2)(c)(v) of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The CRA has…
Continue reading “Loans by a partnership to a partner”…

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Related siblings under section 55

At the 2025 APFF conference, the CRA stated that the sisters in the following scenario would be related as per subparagraph 55(5)(e)(i): Sister A and Sister B each owned 100 percent of the shares of their respective holding corporations, whose…
Continue reading “Related siblings under section 55”…

Subsection 55(2) can be good actually

If subsection 55(2) applies to a dividend, and the cash related to the dividend needs to be paid to an individual shareholder anyway, the shareholder will likely be better off compared to the situation obtained when the subsection does not…
Continue reading “Subsection 55(2) can be good actually”…

Loans by a partnership to a partner

The CRA has generally held that a loan from a partnership to a partner will reduce the ACB of the partner’s partnership interest because of the “all-encompassing” language in subparagraph 53(2)(c)(v) of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The CRA has…
Continue reading “Loans by a partnership to a partner”…

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation