• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

Category: Normal reassessment period

Negligence for not reviewing return

Posted on: June 5, 2025 Last updated on: June 5, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
In 994552 N.W.T. Ltd. v R, 2025 TCC 55, Mr Justice Bocock considered whether the taxpayer corporation was liable to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period for two taxation years and for gross negligence penalties for overclaimed capital cost…
Continue reading “Negligence for not reviewing return”…

Swiss bank account trouble

Posted on: March 7, 2025 Last updated on: March 7, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Azmayesh-Fard v R, 2025 TCC 20, the Court considered whether the CRA had properly reassessed a taxpayer beyond the normal reassessment period and imposed gross negligence penalties for unreported income from a Swiss bank account and for failing to…
Continue reading “Swiss bank account trouble”…

Source of income and the normal reassessment period

Posted on: February 18, 2025 Last updated on: February 14, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Boles v R, 2024 TCC 167, the taxpayers incurred losses in respect of “Dog Activities” (breeding and selling purebred dogs and attending dog shows) and some rental properties. The Court concluded the CRA could not reassess statute-barred years for…
Continue reading “Source of income and the normal reassessment period”…

Reassessment outside the normal reassessment period

Posted on: July 24, 2024 Last updated on: July 18, 2024 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Cheema v R, 2024 TCC 81, the Court held that the CRA was entitled to reassess beyond the normal reassessment period where the taxpayer provided no good explanation for a disposition of real property he did not report or…
Continue reading “Reassessment outside the normal reassessment period”…

Negligent misrepresentation

Posted on: April 27, 2023 Last updated on: April 27, 2023 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Goldhar v R, 2023 TCC 30, the CRA alleged that certain transfers had conferred a benefit on the appellant in a total amount of about $5.5 million. The appellant argued that the transfers were inter-corporate loans that had not…
Continue reading “Negligent misrepresentation”…

Valuations and the normal reassessment period

Posted on: April 13, 2022 Last updated on: April 13, 2022 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Lauria v R, 2021 TCC 66, the taxpayers used a model from a shareholder agreement to value shares they sold to family trusts although an IPO of the issuer of the shares was imminent. The Court found that the…
Continue reading “Valuations and the normal reassessment period”…

Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period

Posted on: February 15, 2022 Last updated on: February 15, 2022 Written by: John Loukidelis
This article discusses Hansen v R, 2020 TCC 102. In our view, the Hansen decision is consistent with the four-part test established in Aridi v R, 2013 TCC 74. Mr. Hansen was aware that there was a PRE and that…
Continue reading “Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period”…

Taxpayer onus regarding limitation period

Posted on: March 1, 2021 Last updated on: March 1, 2021 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Manna v R, 2019 TCC 70 (informal procedure) the Court held that the taxpayer has the onus to show when a normal reassessment period began if the taxpayer wishes to rely on the expiry of the period as a…
Continue reading “Taxpayer onus regarding limitation period”…

A valuable envelope

Posted on: June 14, 2018 Last updated on: June 18, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
S 244(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) provides that an assessment is deemed to have been made on the date that it is sent, and the date on which an assessment is sent by first class mail “or its…
Continue reading “A valuable envelope”…

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Capital gain exemption fail

I wrote the following article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal on Ehresman v R, 2025 TCC 78. For another summary of the case, see Colin Bartlett “Are Excess Cash Reserves an Active Business Asset?” 25:4 Tax for the Owner-Manager…
Continue reading “Capital gain exemption fail”…

Relevant group entities

A relevant group entity (RGE) of a corporation (per subaparagraphs 84.1(2.31)(c)(iii) and 84.1(2.32)(c)(iii) in the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules) is any entity carrying on an active business that is relevant to whether the corporation’s shares are qualified small business corporation…
Continue reading “Relevant group entities”…

IGT, de facto control and notes

The immediate transfer regime under the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules found in subsection 84.1(2.31) will not provide a safe harbour from section 84.1, if the taxpayer-vendor at any time after the sale, either alone or with a spouse, has de…
Continue reading “IGT, de facto control and notes”…

Recent Posts

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Capital gain exemption fail

I wrote the following article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal on Ehresman v R, 2025 TCC 78. For another summary of the case, see Colin Bartlett “Are Excess Cash Reserves an Active Business Asset?” 25:4 Tax for the Owner-Manager…
Continue reading “Capital gain exemption fail”…

Relevant group entities

A relevant group entity (RGE) of a corporation (per subaparagraphs 84.1(2.31)(c)(iii) and 84.1(2.32)(c)(iii) in the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules) is any entity carrying on an active business that is relevant to whether the corporation’s shares are qualified small business corporation…
Continue reading “Relevant group entities”…

IGT, de facto control and notes

The immediate transfer regime under the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules found in subsection 84.1(2.31) will not provide a safe harbour from section 84.1, if the taxpayer-vendor at any time after the sale, either alone or with a spouse, has de…
Continue reading “IGT, de facto control and notes”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Capital gain exemption fail

I wrote the following article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal on Ehresman v R, 2025 TCC 78. For another summary of the case, see Colin Bartlett “Are Excess Cash Reserves an Active Business Asset?” 25:4 Tax for the Owner-Manager…
Continue reading “Capital gain exemption fail”…

Relevant group entities

A relevant group entity (RGE) of a corporation (per subaparagraphs 84.1(2.31)(c)(iii) and 84.1(2.32)(c)(iii) in the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules) is any entity carrying on an active business that is relevant to whether the corporation’s shares are qualified small business corporation…
Continue reading “Relevant group entities”…

IGT, de facto control and notes

The immediate transfer regime under the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules found in subsection 84.1(2.31) will not provide a safe harbour from section 84.1, if the taxpayer-vendor at any time after the sale, either alone or with a spouse, has de…
Continue reading “IGT, de facto control and notes”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation