• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 64)

More ‘Fun’ With Section 160

Posted on: February 9, 2013 Last updated on: February 9, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis

I’ve written a number of blog posts and articles on the “long arm” of section 160 of the Income Tax Act (Canada), and I’ve mentioned that liability under section 160 does not depend on whether the transferor or transferee know of a liability of the transferor in respect of which the section could apply.

Continue reading “More ‘Fun’ With Section 160”…

Technicalities

Posted on: February 2, 2013 Last updated on: February 2, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Oloya v R, 2011 TCC 308, the taxpayer transferred non-cash property to a charity, and the Court was willing to accept that it might have been transferred by way of a gift. The charity, however, issued a receipt that…
Continue reading “Technicalities”…

Point in time due diligence

Posted on: January 17, 2013 Last updated on: January 17, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
A director of a corporation that fails to remit source deductions might be duly diligent to a point in time, and therefore not liable for the failure to that time, but not diligent after that time, and therefore liable for…
Continue reading “Point in time due diligence”…

Coming soon to a taxpayer near you

Posted on: January 17, 2013 Last updated on: January 17, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
In “Soliciting VDs?“, I wrote about the CRA’s “letter campaign”, which is supposed to “to inform taxpayers about their tax obligations and to encourage them to correct any inaccuracies in their past income tax and benefit returns.” The campaign continues,…
Continue reading “Coming soon to a taxpayer near you”…

Income averaging?

Posted on: December 15, 2012 Last updated on: December 15, 2012 Written by: John Loukidelis

Mark Hunter pointed out to me that paragraph 20(1)(j) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) doesn’t work well as an income-averaging tool if used in circumstances where the person taking the loan can’t repay it any time soon or will do so in a year without much income.

Continue reading “Income averaging?”…

Donation tax shelter case

Posted on: December 12, 2012 Last updated on: December 12, 2012 Written by: John Loukidelis

Hamilton’s own Mr Justice Randall Bocock goes head-to-head with Maréchaux in Berg v R, 2012 TCC 406.

Continue reading “Donation tax shelter case”…

Estate planning and personal use real property

Posted on: November 21, 2012 Last updated on: November 21, 2012 Written by: John Loukidelis
I just listened to a helpful presentation on estate planning for personal use real property by Robin MacKnight at the Law Society’s seminar on “Taxation Issues in Real Estate Transactions“.
Continue reading “Estate planning and personal use real property”…

Subsection 83(2.1) applied

Posted on: November 11, 2012 Last updated on: November 11, 2012 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Groupe Honco inc. c R, 2012 CCI 305, the Tax Court applied the anti-avoidance rule in subsection 83(2.1) to a dividend purported to be paid from the capital dividend account of a corporation taken over by another so that…
Continue reading “Subsection 83(2.1) applied”…

No rectification necessary

Posted on: November 11, 2012 Last updated on: November 11, 2012 Written by: John Loukidelis
In Twomey v R, 2012 TCC 310, the taxpayer thought he had been issued 100 Common Shares in the capital of a corporation, but the minute book indicated he had received only one. The difference mattered: whether the taxpayer could…
Continue reading “No rectification necessary”…

Guindon appealed

Posted on: November 1, 2012 Last updated on: November 1, 2012 Written by: John Loukidelis
The Crown filed its appeal in Guindon yesterday.
Continue reading “Guindon appealed”…
« Previous page 1 … 62 63 64 65 66 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation