• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 61)

Thoughts on things cross border

Posted on: February 12, 2014 Last updated on: February 12, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
Please see this post for an interesting perspective on some of the 2014 Budget’s cross-border measures by my colleague, Jonathan Garbutt of Garbutt Tax Law. In addition, the Tax Lawyers Alliance, Garbutt Tax Law and EMG Transfer Pricing Experts are…
Continue reading “Thoughts on things cross border”…

Berg Overturned

Posted on: February 6, 2014 Last updated on: February 6, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis

The Federal Court of Appeal, at 2014 FCA 25, has overturned the Tax Court decision in Berg v R, 2012 TCC 406, which I wrote about here.

Continue reading “Berg Overturned”…

PAC news

Posted on: January 16, 2014 Last updated on: January 16, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
From the CRA “Income Tax Technical Publications” email list: “Income Tax Folio Chapter S4-F3-C1: Price Adjustment Clauses has been updated along with its Chapter History page. The effective date of the update is January 14, 2014.”
Continue reading “PAC news”…

Ponzi schemes

Posted on: January 11, 2014 Last updated on: January 11, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
Ponzi schemes have some “interesting” tax consequences for their unfortunate victims. It seems that the schemes pose some challenges in the bankruptcy context as well. In Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101, the Court approved a settlement under which some of…
Continue reading “Ponzi schemes”…

Depression

Posted on: January 4, 2014 Last updated on: January 4, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
“‘Natural Person’ Tax Evasion Theory Caused ‘Staggering Losses’ At CRA: Report” For some reason, this story depresses me.
Continue reading “Depression”…

Objections and Taxpayer Relief

Posted on: December 12, 2013 Last updated on: December 12, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
The following is from an interesting article on mondaq.com by a couple of lawyers at Gowlings: The CRA recently announced a new pilot project allowing CRA appeals officers to consider applications for interest and penalty relief concurrently with notices of…
Continue reading “Objections and Taxpayer Relief”…

Kossow appeal dismissed

Posted on: December 9, 2013 Last updated on: December 9, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
Apparently, the Federal Court of Appeal has dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal of Kossow v R, 2012 TCC 325. I say “apparently” because the decision was reportedly posted to the Federal Court of Appeal’s website and then taken down rather quickly.
Continue reading “Kossow appeal dismissed”…

Collections While a Reassessment is Under Objection

Posted on: November 27, 2013 Last updated on: November 27, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
Can the CRA force a taxpayer to provide information about net worth and the location and identity of assets for the purposes of assessing the “credit risk” of a debt owing pursuant to an assessment when that assessment is under…
Continue reading “Collections While a Reassessment is Under Objection”…

More tax in the news

Posted on: November 26, 2013 Last updated on: November 26, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
Is it me, or is tax attracting more attention in the news lately (like over the last two or three years)? Here’s an article on tax and corporate finance.
Continue reading “More tax in the news”…

CRA information flow

Posted on: November 7, 2013 Last updated on: November 7, 2013 Written by: John Loukidelis
The OBA tax section sponsored a good session today on “Best Practices for Managing the Flow of Information to and from the Canada Revenue Agency”. A couple of interesting tidbits that came out: 1. Some folks at the CRA seem…
Continue reading “CRA information flow”…
« Previous page 1 … 59 60 61 62 63 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation