• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 56)

Tax simplification

Posted on: December 2, 2014 Last updated on: December 2, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
John Manley, speaking at the Canadian Tax Foundation‘s national conference yesterday, made the case for tax simplification. To which I say “Hah!” I’m just waiting for the “My grandfather was a Greek immigrant who ran a restaurant in North Bay…
Continue reading “Tax simplification”…

HST and damages

Posted on: November 22, 2014 Last updated on: November 22, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
Greg Sawatsky has written a helpful summary of the HST rules applying to certain payments of damages.
Continue reading “HST and damages”…

Objections Can Result in a Bigger Tax Bill

Posted on: November 20, 2014 Last updated on: November 20, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA takes the position that an Appeals officer can issue a reassessment that increases a tax liability if new information supporting the increase comes to light as part of the objection process. Amanda Doucette, “Filing a Notice of Objection…
Continue reading “Objections Can Result in a Bigger Tax Bill”…

Loss Carrybacks and Reassessments

Posted on: November 20, 2014 Last updated on: November 20, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
Alex Klyguine reminds us that, if the CRA reassesses a year and the taxpayer wishes to dispute the reassessment, the taxpayer must be cautious about applying losses of other years to reduce the taxable income of the reassessed year. If…
Continue reading “Loss Carrybacks and Reassessments”…

Future income tax assets

Posted on: November 20, 2014 Last updated on: November 20, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA takes the position that a future income tax asset it not an asset for the purposes of the QSBCS and SBC definitions. Such an asset should be ignored when determining whether a share is a QSBCS or a…
Continue reading “Future income tax assets”…

98(3) News

Posted on: November 19, 2014 Last updated on: November 19, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
Neal Armstrong is on a sarcasm roll this week. After noting that the CRA, in a recent interpretation (2014-0540611E5E), took the position that a 98(3) election is valid only if it is made for all property of the partnership and…
Continue reading “98(3) News”…

Diverted funds

Posted on: November 18, 2014 Last updated on: November 18, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis

Neal Armstrong has written a wonderfully sarcastic case comment on Dimane Enterprises Ltd. v R, 2014 TCC 334.

Continue reading “Diverted funds”…

Brogan

Posted on: November 11, 2014 Last updated on: February 3, 2022 Written by: John Loukidelis
Craig Burley has written a brief summary of Canada (Atty-General) v Brogan Family Trust, 2014 ONSC 6354, a recent case on rectification. I’m skeptical of the idea that the CRA has no interest in a rectification application if it is…
Continue reading “Brogan”…

Spousal trust issues

Posted on: November 2, 2014 Last updated on: November 2, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis

Colleen Ma, in Canadian Tax Focus 4:3 (August, 2014) summarizes some issues with spousal trusts:

Continue reading “Spousal trust issues”…

Portrait of the Tax Nerd as a Middle-aged Man

Posted on: October 29, 2014 Last updated on: October 29, 2014 Written by: John Loukidelis
I noticed today that the clauses in subparagraph 256(7)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) are missing a conjunction. David Sherman and his team confirmed that Parliament enacted amendments to the subparagraph that omitted the conjunction. In fact, there should…
Continue reading “Portrait of the Tax Nerd as a Middle-aged Man”…
« Previous page 1 … 54 55 56 57 58 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation