• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 37)

Director escapes liability

Posted on: March 30, 2018 Last updated on: March 30, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
Subsection 227.1(2) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) provides that a director is not personally liable for unremitted source deductions unless (a) a certificate for the amount of the corporation’s liability referred to in that subsection has been registered in…
Continue reading “Director escapes liability”…

CRA backs off on employment expenses

Posted on: February 16, 2018 Last updated on: February 16, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
It appears the CRA has backed off its employment expenses project. A colleague of mine sent a release he received from CRA Audit, which read in part as follows: Effective immediately, the Agency will stop reviewing and disallowing “other employment…
Continue reading “CRA backs off on employment expenses”…

Non-competes

Posted on: February 13, 2018 Last updated on: February 13, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis

We all know that section 56.4 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) is a hot mess. A recent CRA technical interpretation (2017-0688301I7) (TI) illustrates well one of the reasons why.

Continue reading “Non-competes”…

Flipping out

Posted on: February 12, 2018 Last updated on: February 12, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
You buy a vacant lot, build a home on it, move into the home for a few weeks and then you sell the home for a tidy profit very soon thereafter. You claim the principal residence exemption (the PRE) so…
Continue reading “Flipping out”…

New frontier

Posted on: February 6, 2018 Last updated on: February 6, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
Alex Klyguine, in “Income Splitting After the New Private Corporation Proposals: Salaries Paid to Family Members” 8:1 Canadian Tax Focus (February 2018), discusses Gabco Limited v MNR, 68 DTC 5210 (Ex. Ct.)), and suggests that “the boundaries of the reasonableness test…
Continue reading “New frontier”…

SBD limit assignment headaches

Posted on: January 20, 2018 Last updated on: February 6, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
A CCPC might want to assign a portion of is small business deduction limit to another corporation because of the specified corporate income rules. The assignment will be problematic, however, if the assignor’s year-end occurs before that of the assignee.…
Continue reading “SBD limit assignment headaches”…

Pipeline death watch?

Posted on: January 20, 2018 Last updated on: January 20, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
Finance is not proceeding with the July, 2017, proposals to amend 84.1 and introduce new 246.1. Also, Finance has said that it will focus on developing the passive income proposals. Finance has also said, however, that it believes post-mortem gains…
Continue reading “Pipeline death watch?”…

“May deduct”

Posted on: January 13, 2018 Last updated on: January 13, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
Using “a textual, contextual and purposive analysis”, the Tax Court in Zhang v R, 2017 TCC 258 (informal procedure), concluded that “may deduct” in ‘D’ in the formula in 118.61(1) meant “is entitled to deduct” rather than “chooses to deduct”.
Continue reading ““May deduct””…

CDA timing

Posted on: January 13, 2018 Last updated on: January 13, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
A corporate-recipient of a capital dividend is entitled to add the amount of the dividend to its capital dividend account at the time the dividend is received even where the relevant election is late-filed. CRA technical interpretation 2017-0718311E5.
Continue reading “CDA timing”…

Project for employees

Posted on: January 12, 2018 Last updated on: January 13, 2018 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA has a new ‘project’ underway. This time the target is employees who deduct employment expenses under section 8 of the Income Tax Act. The CRA seems to be on the lookout for employees who are also shareholders of…
Continue reading “Project for employees”…
« Previous page 1 … 35 36 37 38 39 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation