• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 27)

Section 160 and Director Liability

Posted on: August 5, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
In R v Colitto, 2020 FCA 70, rev’g 2019 TCC 88, the Court considered when the liability of a director arises under section 227.1 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”) for the purposes of section 160 of the…
Continue reading “Section 160 and Director Liability”…

We have moved!

Posted on: August 5, 2020 Last updated on: December 10, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
We have moved! We are still at 20 Hughson St S in Hamilton, but our new suite number is 707. All of our other contact details remain the same. Our updated contact information can be found here. Because of COVID-19,…
Continue reading “We have moved!”…

COVID-19 update

Posted on: July 3, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
Our office remains closed for now even as the province re-opens after the pandemic. We continue to serve our clients, however, by phone and by email. Our contact information can be found here.
Continue reading “COVID-19 update”…

Excess CDA election

Posted on: July 3, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
A corporation purports to pay a capital dividend, but a portion of the dividend is in excess of the balance of the corporation’s capital dividend account (CDA). The corporation pays Part III tax on the excess rather than elect under…
Continue reading “Excess CDA election”…

159(5) elections

Posted on: June 29, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
An estate can file an election under subsection 159(5) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) using form T2075. The election permits the deferral of the payment of taxes owing as a result of the deemed disposition of property on death.…
Continue reading “159(5) elections”…

55(3)(a) purpose test?

Posted on: June 29, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
The CRA believes that a dividend otherwise exempt under paragraph 55(3)(a) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) will be subject to GAAR if one of the purposes of the dividend was to increase the cost of property contrary to the…
Continue reading “55(3)(a) purpose test?”…

Section 160 and FMV Consideration

Posted on: June 29, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
A dental professional corporation (the vendor) sold its professional practice to an arm’s length purchaser. Some of the proceeds from the sale were paid to the shareholder of the corporation (the dentist) who used the funds to pay obligations of…
Continue reading “Section 160 and FMV Consideration”…

Back-to-back loans

Posted on: June 29, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
Bill C-29 (Dec 2016) amended the Income Tax Act (Canada) so that a loan by a corporation to an arm’s length entity could be treated as a loan to a shareholder of the corporation if the entity is required to…
Continue reading “Back-to-back loans”…

Hiatus

Posted on: June 29, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
I haven’t posted since May 20, 2020, which represents one of the longest (if not the longest) stretches I’ve gone without adding content to this site. My site was hacked, and so it has taken me a while a to…
Continue reading “Hiatus”…

Burden of proof

Posted on: May 20, 2020 Last updated on: October 2, 2020 Written by: John Loukidelis
One sometimes hears that a taxpayer’s task in a Tax Court appeal is to “demolish” the assumptions of the CRA (as listed in the Crown’s Reply) by proving them wrong on a balance of probabilities. Webb JA, in Morrison v.…
Continue reading “Burden of proof”…
« Previous page 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 109 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump

In an intergenerational business transfer (IBT), the purchaser does not generally acquire control of the targetco for the purposes of the rule in ITA paragraph 88(1)(d.2). As a result, the tax cost of the eligible assets of targetco likely cannot…
Continue reading “IBTs and the 88(1)(d) bump”…

No obligation to correct past errors

The CRA believes that a tax adviser should takes steps to ensure their clients correct past errors (I01-1R2 (February 17, 2026), paras. 116-117), but neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act impose such a duty. Other statutes…
Continue reading “No obligation to correct past errors”…

Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption

Under subsection 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”), where a corporation resident in Canada has redeemed, acquired or cancelled in any manner whatever … any of the shares of any class of its capital stock, (a) the…
Continue reading “Timing of receipt of dividend on redemption”…

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation