• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

LPC Notes (page 2)

Relevant group entities

Posted on: February 17, 2026 Last updated on: February 13, 2026 Written by: John Loukidelis
A relevant group entity (RGE) of a corporation (per subaparagraphs 84.1(2.31)(c)(iii) and 84.1(2.32)(c)(iii) in the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules) is any entity carrying on an active business that is relevant to whether the corporation’s shares are qualified small business corporation…
Continue reading “Relevant group entities”…

IGT, de facto control and notes

Posted on: February 16, 2026 Last updated on: February 13, 2026 Written by: John Loukidelis
The immediate transfer regime under the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules found in subsection 84.1(2.31) will not provide a safe harbour from section 84.1, if the taxpayer-vendor at any time after the sale, either alone or with a spouse, has de…
Continue reading “IGT, de facto control and notes”…

Transfer of property

Posted on: February 13, 2026 Last updated on: February 13, 2026 Written by: John Loukidelis
Subsection 106(2) applies where a taxpayer disposes of an income interest in a trust. Paragraph 106(2)(a) requires the taxpayer to include in income an amount equal to the proceeds of disposition received for the interest less amounts included in the…
Continue reading “Transfer of property”…

Harvard Properties detailed notes

Posted on: January 16, 2026 Last updated on: January 16, 2026 Written by: John Loukidelis
Harvard Properties 2024 TCC 139 per Boyle TCJ General procedure Under appeal A-382-24; A-388-24 “Another Section 160 Tax Avoidance Scam: Harvard Properties” Brian Arnold report 296 Jan 14/25 * Facts The following is a paraphrase of the facts set out…
Continue reading “Harvard Properties detailed notes”…

VD Info Circular Updated

Posted on: October 21, 2025 Last updated on: October 21, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
I just updated my webpage article on voluntary disclosures, which addresses the CRA’s amended policy on VDs found in IC00-1R7 (Voluntary Disclosures Program).
Continue reading “VD Info Circular Updated”…

Poker appeals dismissed

Posted on: August 25, 2025 Last updated on: August 14, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
The taxpayers’ appeals in the poker winnings trilogy of cases have been dismissed: Fournier-Giguère v R, 2025 FCA 112. English translations of the Tax Court decisions are now available. See 2022 TCC 132 (Fournier‑Giguère Judgment), 2023 TCC 3 (D’Auteuil Judgment)…
Continue reading “Poker appeals dismissed”…

Twenty years

Posted on: August 22, 2025 Last updated on: August 14, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
Today is the 20th anniversary of this blog. I made my first post on it on August 22, 2005. I’m now working on post number 1,077.
Continue reading “Twenty years”…

Shares acquired by a trust are QSBCSs

Posted on: August 21, 2025 Last updated on: August 15, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
On January 1, 2023, a newly-formed personal trust purchased shares of Opco from Dad, who owned them throughout the preceding two years. The trust sold the shares on June 30, 2023, to an unrelated person. The CRA found that the…
Continue reading “Shares acquired by a trust are QSBCSs”…

TOSI and a power of attorney

Posted on: August 18, 2025 Last updated on: August 14, 2025 Written by: John Loukidelis
Son is the owner of 10 out of 100 issued Common Shares in the capital of Opco, which are the only issued shares of the corporation. Son grants a power of attorney to his father to exercise all rights to…
Continue reading “TOSI and a power of attorney”…

Vefghi appeal allowed

Posted on: August 16, 2025 Last updated on: February 13, 2026 Written by: John Loukidelis
The Federal Court of Appeal has allowed the Crown’s appeal and dismissed the cross-appeal of one of the taxpayers in Vefghi Holding Corp. v R, 2023 TCC 135, which I discussed here. See R v Vefghi Holding Corporation, 2025 FCA…
Continue reading “Vefghi appeal allowed”…
« Previous page 1 2 3 4 … 110 Next page »

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

Recent Posts

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Directors of a dissolved corporation

In 2008, I wrote an article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal that, among other things, addressed the status of directors of a corporation that has been dissolved. I referred to Leger v R, 2007 TCC 322, which held that,…
Continue reading “Directors of a dissolved corporation”…

DAC Investment

The authors discuss R v DAC Investment Holdings Inc., 2026 FCA 35, rev’g 2024 TCC 63. They conclude that, in a GAAR analysis, an overly-broad characterization of a provision or a mere description of its effect will not correctly express its object, spirit and purpose…
Continue reading “DAC Investment”…

Limits on CRA demands for information

In Canada (National Revenue) v Cohen, 2025 FC 2012, the Court dismissed a Crown application for a compliance order because the taxpayer had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that he had done everything reasonably possible to obtain the documents…
Continue reading “Limits on CRA demands for information”…

Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren

The bump under ITA paragraph 88(1)(d) could be denied if a “specified shareholder” receives bumped property unless the shareholder was also a “specified person” as defined in paragraph 88(1)(c.2). Grandchildren who receive bumped property could taint the bump if they…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and grandchildren”…

Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance

Bump room is determined by the ACB of the target corporation’s shares minus the net tax cost of the underlying assets and the amounts in ITA subparagraph 88(1)(d)(i.1), which include taxable dividends and capital dividends. Accordingly, a target corporation that…
Continue reading “Post-mortem bumps and capital dividends paid from life insurance”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation