• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Loukidelis PC

Loukidelis PC

Effective. Accessible. Responsive

  • Services
  • About
  • LPC Notes
  • Articles
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Skip to menu toggle button

Month: March 2015

Another disclaimer dies

Posted on: March 27, 2015 Last updated on: March 27, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
I’ll admit that email disclaimers are a pet peeve of mine. They seem to embody some of the less loveable characteristics of lawyers and the law. Anyway, apparently the IRS is now telling US tax practitioners to stop using “Circular…
Continue reading “Another disclaimer dies”…

256(6) and Indemnities

Posted on: March 15, 2015 Last updated on: March 15, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
According to CRA technical interpretation 2015-0565741E5, subsection 256(6) will not save the CCPC status of a corporation whose shares are pledged to secure an indemnity. The CRA concluded that an indemnity is not a debt for the purposes of the…
Continue reading “256(6) and Indemnities”…

More T1135 paperwork

Posted on: March 11, 2015 Last updated on: March 11, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis

You file your T1135 for a taxation, and for your trouble the CRA responds with a questionnaire about one of the investments shown on the form. The questionnaire requires the following information (which I have taken almost verbatim from the questionnaire itself):

Continue reading “More T1135 paperwork”…

Notes on Shares of a Specified Class

Posted on: March 6, 2015 Last updated on: March 6, 2015 Written by: John Loukidelis
In applying the association rules in subsection 256(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), one can ignore shares of a specified class as defined in subsection 256(1.1). The CRA has said the following about that definition. Regarding the requirements in…
Continue reading “Notes on Shares of a Specified Class”…

Archives

Categories

Recent notes

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Capital gain exemption fail

I wrote the following article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal on Ehresman v R, 2025 TCC 78. For another summary of the case, see Colin Bartlett “Are Excess Cash Reserves an Active Business Asset?” 25:4 Tax for the Owner-Manager…
Continue reading “Capital gain exemption fail”…

Relevant group entities

A relevant group entity (RGE) of a corporation (per subaparagraphs 84.1(2.31)(c)(iii) and 84.1(2.32)(c)(iii) in the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules) is any entity carrying on an active business that is relevant to whether the corporation’s shares are qualified small business corporation…
Continue reading “Relevant group entities”…

IGT, de facto control and notes

The immediate transfer regime under the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules found in subsection 84.1(2.31) will not provide a safe harbour from section 84.1, if the taxpayer-vendor at any time after the sale, either alone or with a spouse, has de…
Continue reading “IGT, de facto control and notes”…

Transfer of property

Subsection 106(2) applies where a taxpayer disposes of an income interest in a trust. Paragraph 106(2)(a) requires the taxpayer to include in income an amount equal to the proceeds of disposition received for the interest less amounts included in the…
Continue reading “Transfer of property”…

Recent Posts

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Capital gain exemption fail

I wrote the following article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal on Ehresman v R, 2025 TCC 78. For another summary of the case, see Colin Bartlett “Are Excess Cash Reserves an Active Business Asset?” 25:4 Tax for the Owner-Manager…
Continue reading “Capital gain exemption fail”…

Relevant group entities

A relevant group entity (RGE) of a corporation (per subaparagraphs 84.1(2.31)(c)(iii) and 84.1(2.32)(c)(iii) in the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules) is any entity carrying on an active business that is relevant to whether the corporation’s shares are qualified small business corporation…
Continue reading “Relevant group entities”…

IGT, de facto control and notes

The immediate transfer regime under the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules found in subsection 84.1(2.31) will not provide a safe harbour from section 84.1, if the taxpayer-vendor at any time after the sale, either alone or with a spouse, has de…
Continue reading “IGT, de facto control and notes”…

Transfer of property

Subsection 106(2) applies where a taxpayer disposes of an income interest in a trust. Paragraph 106(2)(a) requires the taxpayer to include in income an amount equal to the proceeds of disposition received for the interest less amounts included in the…
Continue reading “Transfer of property”…

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About this site

Click here for an important disclaimer about this site.

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

GLGI appeals to be struck?

In Kelly v R, 2026 TCC 53, Justice Graham has given multiple taxpayers until April 24, 2026, to provide written submissions on why their appeals should not be struck without a hearing “for abusing this Court’s process”. The taxpayers were…
Continue reading “GLGI appeals to be struck?”…

Capital gain exemption fail

I wrote the following article for the Hamilton Law Association Journal on Ehresman v R, 2025 TCC 78. For another summary of the case, see Colin Bartlett “Are Excess Cash Reserves an Active Business Asset?” 25:4 Tax for the Owner-Manager…
Continue reading “Capital gain exemption fail”…

Relevant group entities

A relevant group entity (RGE) of a corporation (per subaparagraphs 84.1(2.31)(c)(iii) and 84.1(2.32)(c)(iii) in the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules) is any entity carrying on an active business that is relevant to whether the corporation’s shares are qualified small business corporation…
Continue reading “Relevant group entities”…

IGT, de facto control and notes

The immediate transfer regime under the intergenerational transfer (IGT) rules found in subsection 84.1(2.31) will not provide a safe harbour from section 84.1, if the taxpayer-vendor at any time after the sale, either alone or with a spouse, has de…
Continue reading “IGT, de facto control and notes”…

Transfer of property

Subsection 106(2) applies where a taxpayer disposes of an income interest in a trust. Paragraph 106(2)(a) requires the taxpayer to include in income an amount equal to the proceeds of disposition received for the interest less amounts included in the…
Continue reading “Transfer of property”…

© Loukidelis Professional Corporation